Richter v. Rose
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
¶1 William R. and Carol Anne Richter (the Richters) brought the underlying action against Joseph C. and Lois F. Rose (the Roses) seeking a declaration that a public right-of-way had been established across the Roses’ property in the early 1900s or, alternatively, a condemnation order granting them an easement across the Roses’ property. The Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, rejected the Richters’ public right-of-way claim but entered a preliminary condemnation order and judgment in their favor.
¶2 The Roses appeal from that order and judgment and from the subsequent denial of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. NyeMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Butte v. MikosowitzMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Dansie v. NolanMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Maynard v. BaraMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Kaufman v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Heller v. GremauxMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Watson v. DundasMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Yeager v. ForbesWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- McCauley v. Thompson-NistlerMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Yellowstone River, LLC v. Meriwether Land Fund I, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.