Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Fry
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided February 18, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 6536PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge.
Jack A. Arthur, Jr., and four other citizens of Sevier County filed a bill in the Chancery Court at Sevierville on January 31, 1969 seeking to enjoin George Fry, defendant, from closing U. S. Highway 441, or Tennessee Highway 73, within the boundaries of the Great Smoky Mountain National Park, or from interfering with commercial traffic over said highway.
A removal petition was filed on February 5, 1969 removing the case to this Court. The petition was filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1442 upon the theory that defendant was being sued in his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- State of Oklahoma v. WillinghamDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1956
- People's United States Bank v. GoodwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1908
- Deniel Morgan v. John T. Willingham, and C. A. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Preston v. EdmondsonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Isaac Camacho v. Autoridad De Telefonos De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Robert Stanley Williams v. Samuel P. Collins, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Wallace v. ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Greater New York Mutual Insurance v. Anchor Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Wallace v. ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981