Spenlinhauer v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
The outcome of the plaintiffs’ motion to remand depends upon the interpretation of a forum selection clause to which the parties agreed when they entered into their stock purchase agreement. The clause provides:
Section 9.9 SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. EACH PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Snapper, Inc. v. RedanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Waters v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Inet Directories, LLC v. Developershed, Inc. Shari Caputo Jonathan CaputoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- RBC Mortgage Co. v. CouchDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gulf Coast Pharmaceuticals Plus, LLC v. RFT Consulting, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2024