Bank v. Markowitz
New York Supreme Court
Actions by Samuel Bank, by his guardian, and by Louis Klinger, by his guardian, against Herman Markowitz. There were a verdict . and a judgment in each case in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant moves for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.
The actions were to recover for wrongful discharge under an alleged special contract for three months. The plaintiffs testified to the contract, and were corroborated by the witness Reiser. The defendant denied the contract alleged, and claimed that the employment was by the week only, and that the plaintiffs were fully paid up to the time of their discharge. The defendant then called Sigfried Levin and Morris Mongolus, who testified that they were in the- defendant’s employ, were present in the factory when the plaintiffs were employed, and that the hiring was by the week only, whereupon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hess v. SloaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Nugent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Stein v. New York News Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Silvernail v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903