Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Utica Mutual Insurance v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1997No. A97A0781Published

1ConcurrenceRuffin, Judge

I concur in the court’s opinion, but not without concern over the due process issues Judge Beasley raises in her separate opinion. As she notes, due process may well require that the ward receive personal notice of the guardian’s attempts to end their relationship. As Judge Smith correctly states, however, the statutory scheme as currently designed by the Legislature does not require the guardian to personally serve the ward with a copy of the petition for dismission. Judge Beasley’s partial dissent, in effect, is an effort to declare unconstitutional these statutory notice provisions by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allan v. AllanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Braden v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. DECATUR FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. LitskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Pollard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Gay v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API