Legal Opinion

MCB Woodberry Developer v. Millrace Condo.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 16, 2021No. 1187/20Published

1Opinion of the Court

MCB Woodberry Developer, LLC v. The Council of Unit Owners of the Millrace Condominium, Inc., et al., No. 1187, September Term 2020. Opinion by Harrell, J. CIVIL IMMUNITY – ANTI-SLAPP STATUTE – Developer did not state a plausible claim that the residents of a condominium and townhouse development and their homeowners’ associations violated the community declaration by opposing actions by the developer to modify the planned unit development.

Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-807(b)(2) & (3). CIVIL IMMUNITY – ANTI-SLAPP STATUTE – Communications by residents of condominium and townhouse…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API