Legal Opinion

Teague v. Russell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1830PublishedCited by 10 opinions

James Teague filed his hill in Chancery in Franklin Circuit Court, against J. Russell and W. Moore. The bill charged that on the 17th of February, 1817, the complainant and one Byrd, borrowed of Russell $400 for twelve months, at ter- per cent, interest; that the complainant borrowed $150, and Byrd $250; that complainant gave his note under seal for $165, for the repayment, with Byrd as security, and Byrd gave his for $275, with the complainant as security; that on the 12th…

Read the full summary

James Teague filed his hill in Chancery in Franklin Circuit Court, against J. Russell and W. Moore. The bill charged that on the 17th of February, 1817, the complainant and one Byrd, borrowed of Russell $400 for twelve months, at ter- per cent, interest; that the complainant borrowed $150, and Byrd $250; that complainant gave his note under seal for $165, for the repayment, with Byrd as security, and Byrd gave his for $275, with the complainant as security; that on the 12th of March, 1818, the complainant paid off his note, and took it up, and Russell gave him a receipt in writing for the…

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE COLLIER.

The questions for our decisions, are these:

1. Do the facts disclosed in the plaintiff’s bill, interpose a bar to a recovery, by the defendant Moore.

2. Supposing the question to be answered affirmatively, is it competent for equity to administer relief?

• These questions are so closely blended, that for the sake of perspicuity, we will consider them together. It is no objection to the recovery of the sum expressed in the bond, that a larger per centum, by way of interest, was reserved, than the law authorized; for it will be observed, that at the time the bond was executed, the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. David v. ShepardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  3. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. CoxDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984
  4. Central Savings Bank v. DanckmeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Pierpont v. FowleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1846

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API