Legal Opinion

Sheiman v. US Dept of the Treasury

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 7, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01138Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MICHAEL E. SHEIMAN, Plaintiff, No. 3:22-cv-1138 (MPS) v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Defendant. RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Michael Sheiman, a former employee of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS), claims that the Department of the Treasury is wrongfully collecting a debt from him, and he invokes this Court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1). The Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 For the reasons explained below, I GRANT the motion under Rule 12(b)(1), finding…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Graham v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Jeanina Celestine v. Mount Vernon Neighborhood Health Center, United States of America, No. 04-0839-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API