Legal Opinion
Cole v. Yearwood
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 5, 1941No. 8 Div. 117PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The appeal is from a final decree and that affirming the register’s report.
The facts succinctly stated are that Cole and Yearwood were partners doing business as R. L. Cole Horse & Mule Company; they took notes and mortgages to secure sales and hypothecated the same to the banks indicated; appellant Cole executed a note and chattel mortgage to complainant Yearwood for $10,000, in settlement of their business affairs, and at the same time, Year-wood executed and delivered to Cole the following instrument:
“It is hereby agreed by and between R. L. Cole, party of the first part,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunter-Benn Co. Company v. Bassett Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Montgomery Enterprises v. Empire Theater Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Mobile County v. LinchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Williams v. Johns-Carroll Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Weeden v. AsburySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haddox v. First Alabama Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Anco Tv Cable Co. v. Vista Com. Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Marbury-Pattillo Construction Co. v. Bayside Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Broadmoor Realty, Inc. v. First Nationwide BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Williams v. KillenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.