Legal Opinion

Gellis v. Casey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 8, 1972No. 72 Civ. 330PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MacMAHON, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Rule 65, Fed.R. Civ.P., enjoining the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from proceeding against him with an administrative hearing into alleged violations of the securities laws. We granted a temporary restraining order pending decision of the motion for a preliminary injunction.

Plaintiff, a registered securities representative, is one of several defendants in the SEC administrative proceeding. Prior to the commencement of hearings on January 4, 1972, plaintiff was informed by the SEC that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Carl Simon, Robert Kaiser and Melvin Fishman, and Harold Roth, Irving L. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Simon v. WhartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. M. G. Davis & Co. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brock v. TolkowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  2. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc., United States, Intervenor. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc., Edward R. Luter, United States, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. SecCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. International Business MacHines Corp. v. BrownDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. GilbertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API