Legal Opinion
State v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 12, 2002No. 2001-KP-1399PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
816 So.2d 289 (2002)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Christopher D. ARNOLD.
No. 2001-KP-1399.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
April 12, 2002.
2Per curiam
Writ granted; convictions and sentences reinstated. Generally, guilty pleas constitute a waiver of all non-jurisdictional defects, see, e.g., State v. McKinney, 406 So.2d 160, 161 (La.1981), and generally courts review them only to ensure that the plea "was both counseled and voluntary." United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 569, 109 S.Ct. 757, 762, 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989). Though the Supreme Court and this Court have created an exception to this rule for double jeopardy…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hagan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. ButlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
4Cited by27 opinions
- State v. ChessonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Commonwealth v. NegronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- State v. LandfairLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- State v. GarciaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. GobertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.