Legal Opinion

Apartment Investment & Management Co. v. Flamingo/South Beach 1 Condominium Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 14, 2012No. 3D11-2646PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.

Apartment Investment and Management Company, et al. (collectively, “AIMCO”) appeal from a non-final order denying their motion to compel arbitration. We affirm.

On June 7, 2011, Flamingo/South Beach 1 Condominium Association, Inc. (“the Association”) sued AIMCO alleging that it ■violated provisions of the Reciprocal Maintenance, Use and Easement Agreement (“the Agreement”). The Agreement subjects three parcels (the North, Center, and South Towers) to various easements, restrictions, and covenants that run with the land. Under the Agreement, the South Tower was allocated thirty-two percent of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Citigroup, Inc. v. AmodioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Gables Racing Assoc., Inc. v. PerskySupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. IDEARC MEDIA CORP. v. FriedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Collinson v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duty Free World v. Miami Perfume JunctionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. MDC 6, LLC v. NRG INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. DAVID WILSON v. AMERILIFE OF EAST PASCO, L L CDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Berk v. BerkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Eminence Healthcare, Inc. v. Centuri Health Ventures, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API