Legal Opinion

North British & Mercantile Insurance v. San Francisco Securities Corp.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1926No. Civil No. 2484PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

On or about March 10th, 1922, one A. H. McClure sold to Harmon Temple a certain Chalmers automobile, under a conditional sales contract. . McClure on the same date sold the contract to the San Francisco Securities Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff. The latter immediately secured from the North British So Mercantile Insurance Company, Limited, hereinafter called de fendant, an insurance policy, insuring plaintiff against loss by fire, theft, or pilferage of the car, in the sum of eight hundred dollars. April 6th, 1922, the automobile was destroyed by fire, and on June 5th…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. FranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Phoenix Assurance Co. of London v. Munger Improved Cotton MacHine Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ætna Insurance v. SimmonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McKenzie v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Delaware Insurance v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Group v. Home Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. EUREKA-SECURITY FIRE & MARINE INSU. CO. v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Hartford Insurance Group v. WinklerNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Smith v. Republic National Life Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API