Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bridges v. Anderson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 2016No. 2016-CA-0432Published

1DissentJenkins, J.

hi respectfully dissent. In a review of the record of this matter, I find the trial court erred as a matter of law by granting the eviction without taking any evidence, without the introduction of any exhibits, and without placing any witnesses under oath. The transcript of the proceeding indicates that no exhibits were introduced and neither party was placed under oath. Rather, the trial court merely discussed this matter with the parties in open court without taking evidence or hearing any sworn testimony on this matter. Thus, the record is void of any evidence establishing the legal ground…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Housing Authority of New Orleans v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Housing Authority of New Orleans v. HaynesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Caluda Realty Trust v. Fifth BusinessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API