Legal Opinion

Strianese v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in this action was denied. The complaint alleges that the defendant insurance company issued a policy of insurance for $2,500 on the life of one Emil Strianese, plaintiff’s brother, in which it was agreed to pay that sum to the beneficiary named in the policy on the death of the insured. The policy granted the insured the right to change the beneficiary.

The insured expressed a wish to change the beneficiary so as to substitute the plaintiff in place of those who were named in the policy, and the complaint alleges that in accordance with the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fink v. . FinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Schoenholz v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Orcutt v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Seavers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In re the Submission of Controversy under Sections 546 & 547 of the Civil Practice Act between Chatham Phenix National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. In re the Estate of O'NeillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. In re the Estate of PastoreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. Poucher v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API