Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Berwyn E. Etter

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 27, 1985No. 84-1213Published

1Concurrence

NIES, Circuit Judge, with whom SMITH and BISSELL, Circuit Judges,

join, concurring.

While I agree with the result reached by the majority, I disagree with the majority opinion insofar as it holds that, in a reexamination proceeding, a patent is never accorded the presumption of validity. In this case it makes no difference whether the presumption is or is not applied, as the board itself stated. The holding that the claimed invention would have been obvious over art not previously considered is fully justified, had the presumption been recognized.

This case illustrates the advantage of the new…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API