Beck v. Goar
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Tipton Circuit Court; J. F. Elliott, Judge. Action by Charles Beck against Joseph N. Goar. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
Appellant’s complaint was in four paragraphs. The first three counted upon an alleged written obligation of appellee in the sale of certain personal property, and the good will of a business, and the obligation of appellee not to enter into the business in the city of Tipton, or aid any other person to do so for ^the period of three years, or in case of violation of the agreement to pay appellant $2,000 with attorney’s fees. The fourth paragraph counted upon alleged fraudulent representations in the sale of the same property. A demurrer for want of facts was sustained to the fourth paragraph…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Dodge v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Jones v. HathawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Matlock v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- West v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baylies v. Vanden BoomWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Grosgebauer v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Voorhees v. CragunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Lyons v. SouderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Kluge v. RiesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.