Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 2000No. 2D99-3976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

John Mark Anderson appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief, but write because the trial court’s analysis was flawed when it failed to address and refute Anderson’s claim that he was illegally ha-bitualized.

Anderson filed a prior motion to correct illegal sentence in this same case, which raised a double jeopardy claim. The trial court denied relief in an order rendered September 16, 1998. Anderson appealed that order, and this court affirmed. See Anderson v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Raley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Woodall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Harper v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. JERRY LEWIS JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API