Anonymous
Superior Court of North Carolina
It was said in this caso, by Mr, Moore, and not denied by any of the bar, tiiat it had bmi decided in this court a few terms .ago, that letters of administration granted in another State, couid not cutíti the administrator to maintain a suit here. Though he said this question was reserved; and j et depended in Salisbury, in the case of Hillary Suits’s Administrators v. Miac Pries.
1Opinion of the Court
Haywood, Justice.
I was concerned in the case at Salisbury to support the affirmative of the proposition and have taken much pains to inform myself of the law, and I think if is as the court decided here.
Notb. — It is cerium that the English law is agreeable to the decision at Wilmington, as related by Mr. Moore. 2 Atk. 63 H. Bl. Re. 146, 152, 153, 154. Wil. 370, 371. Dyer 803. Swinb. 441. 9 Rep 39. God. 232, s. 8, 71. Cro. El 472. Salk. 40. 1 Vern. 397, 307. 1 Mo. C. 244. 3 Term 387. And the reason given in some of these books is, that if the granting the letters of admins) ration be denied,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Neil v. DillonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1831