Legal Opinion

Tripoli v. Tripoli

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1982PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The propriety of the Appellate Division’s holding that it was error to have set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence is beyond the scope of this court’s power of review (Rochester Tel. Corp. v Green Is. Constr. Corp., 51 NY2d 788; Gutin v Mascali & Sons, 11 NY2d 97, 99; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 148, p 588).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gutin v. Mascali & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. Green Island Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Mertsaris v. 73rd Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Dannick v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Salazar v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Annunziata v. ColasantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API