Legal Opinion · Dissent
Seward v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 22, 1912PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1DissentBrown, J.
This is an action to recover damages under chapter 858, Laws 1909, for preventing or attempting to prevent the plaintiff from obtaining employment with certain railroad companies as an engineer.
The plaintiff entered the employment of the defendant as engineer, on 31 January, 1907, and was discharged on 9 January, 1909. After his discharge he applied to the Florida East Coast Railroad Company for employment, and this company, with the consent of the plaintiff, requested the defendant to give it a report of the record of the plaintiff, to which request the defendant replied on 22 January, 1909,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. RichmondTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Willner v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Hebner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Hundley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Houpe v. City of StatesvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Loparex, LLC v. MPI Release Technologies, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Cotton v. Fisheries Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Elmore v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Ange v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.