Legal Opinion

Mapp v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1987No. C-6263PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a suit for workers’ compensation benefits. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurance carrier, Maryland Casualty. The court of appeals affirmed, holding that there were no material facts raised as to whether Clara Mapp was acting in the course and scope of her employment at the time of her injury. 725 S.W.2d 516 (Tex.App.1987). We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the trial court.

We do not agree as a matter of law that Mapp was not within the course and scope of her employment. We hold a fact question is presented. The court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Shelton v. Standard Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Mapp v. Maryland Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas Mutual Insurance Company v. Ronald Jerrols, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  2. North River Insurance Co. v. Purdy, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  3. Berry v. Gregg Industrial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Albert Ray Williams v. Great Western Distributing Company of Amarillo D/B/A Bill Reed Distributing Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2016
  5. Rudolph Automotive, LLC D/B/A Rudolph Mazda v. Andrea Juarez, Individually and as of the Estate of Irma Vanessa Villegas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API