Betts v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMonaco, J.
Although the appellants raise a number of matters for our consideration, we conclude that the trial court committed no error and affirm. We write to address one issue, however, concerning whether an amendment to rule 1.442, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, applies in an on-going case where the acceptance period of a proposal for settlement has expired on the effective date of the amendment. We agree with the trial judge that it does not.
The appellants, Wendy Betts and John Cardegna, filed a class action complaint against the appellees, Ace Cash Express, Inc., Check Express, Inc., and other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oruga Corp. v. AT&T WIRELESS OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Pearlstein v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Mendez-Perez v. Perez-PerezSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Betts v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION v. GADITH SABBAH, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- Stevens, Stevens v. Florida Peninsula Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025