Legal Opinion

EmCyte Corp. v. Apex Biologix

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 28, 2024No. 2:19-cv-00769Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION EMCYTE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. 2:19-cv-769-JES-NPM XLMEDICA, INC., and ANNA STAHL, Defendants / Counterclaimants, v. EMCYTE CORPORATION and PATRICK PENNIE, Counterclaim Defendants. DISCOVERY ORDER This lawsuit arises from a dispute over trademark rights concerning plaintiff EmCyte’s blood-concentrating systems PURE PRP® SupraPhysiologic (PURE PRP) and PURE BMC™ SupraPhysiologic (PURE BMC). EmCyte alleges that defendants Anna Stahl (a former employee of EmCyte) and her company, XLMedica, engaged in trademark…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edgewater Hospital, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
  3. Taylor Woodrow Construction Corp. v. Sarasota/Manatee Airport AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
  4. White Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. ML Healthcare Services, LLC v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API