Legal Opinion

Foster v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1923No. 24,821PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

By this action, the plaintiffs, F. H. Foster, as state bank commissioner, and B. V. Curry, as receiver of the Citizens State Bank of Harper, seek to compel the defendant to deliver to the receiver certain papers and documents, described as notes and guaranties, in the hands of the defendant as president of the bank and belonging to it at the time the receiver took possession of it and of its assets. An.alternative writ of mandamus has been issued.

The defendant has filed a motion to quash the alternative writ on the ground that it does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Railway-Frog Co. v. HavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Jeffries v. BacastowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. State ex rel. Copper Butte Mines v. GuertinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Fasnacht v. German Literary Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Coldwater Copper Mining Co. v. GillisMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Powell v. State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Schwab v. KlapperSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. Kreipe v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Terrill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Inter-Ocean Reinsurance Co. v. DickeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API