Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Benson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 1983No. 10-81-08273; CA A24326Published

1DissentWarden, J.

I agree with the majority that defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction of attempted rape, was properly denied by the trial court. I also agree with the majority conclusion that admission of the testimony of the victim, that she realized she could be raped did not constitute reversible error.

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the giving of the instruction quoted by the majority did not constitute *474reversible error. The instruction begins by correctly pointing out that the state must prove “conduct which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. R. J. Frank Realty, Inc. v. HeuvelOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API