Legal Opinion

Barkenthien v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Dina Barkenthien, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 31st day of July, 1912, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Queens County Special Term, dismissing the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

This is a proceeding to obtain registration of a title to real property, pursuant to the provisions of the Beal Property Law (Consol. ■ Laws, chap. 50 [Laws of 1909, chap. 52, as amd. by Laws of 1910, chap. 627], §§ 370-435), familiarly known, but inaccurately described, as the Torrens Law. The application for registration, after alleging that the applicant is the owner in fee simple absolute of the said real property, further alleged that the applicant claimed that prior to 1846 the premises sought to be registered belonged to one Joaquina Jose Vasquez, who, dying in that year, left…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . BallardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Duffy v. ShirdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Glos v. HallowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Voorhies v. VoorhiesNew York Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jamieson & Bond Co. v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Barkenthien v. PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API