Legal Opinion

DiMeglio v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 29, 2011No. 2783PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICK J. SHARER (Retired, Specially Assigned), J.

Appellant, Joseph Julian DiMeglio, avers in his brief that in the jurisdictions of this State where “DUI/drug courts” function it is common for sanctions to be imposed by those courts, and that frequently defendants are subsequently further punished upon violation of the conditions of probation imposed by sentencing judges. Because that is precisely the outcome of his alcohol-related traffic violations, he argues that his Fifth Amendment double jeopardy rights have been violated.

Appellant was arrested and charged, in the District Court for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Brookman State v. CarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Brookman & Carnes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API