Legal Opinion

MARS, INC. v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 10, 2007No. Civil Action 90-49 (JCL)Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND COIN ACCEPTORS, INC., CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE: COINCO '839 PATENT

JOHN C. LIFLAND, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon the counterclaim of Defendant Coin Acceptors, Inc. (“Coinco” or “Defendant”) against Plaintiffs Mars, Incorporated and Mars Electronics International, Inc. (collectively, “Mars” or “Plaintiff’) regarding Mars’ alleged contributory and induced infringement of Claims 13 and 16 of Coinco’s U.S. Patent No. 4,034,839 (“the '839 patent”). 1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Coineo has failed to establish either contributory…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API