Legal Opinion

People v. Garcia

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 2006No. B187453PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, Acting P. J.

The celebrated case of Terry v. Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 1 [20 L.Ed.2d 889, 88 S.Ct. 1868], allows the police to perform a “patdown search” for weapons where there is reason to believe that the person is armed and dangerous. This rule cannot be “morphed” into a new rule to justify a search for ordinary evidence, here evidence of identification. We reverse. As we shall explain, nothing in either the letter or spirit of Terry v Ohio, supra, 392 U.S. 1 [20 L.Ed.2d 889, 88 S.Ct. 1868] can be used as a springboard to justify a “patdown” search for identification.

Luis Acevedo…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. H.M.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. In Re HMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. In re D.C. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. In re S.P. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. Choto CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API