Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Espinoza Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1990No. 89-6334PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Following his conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, and of aiding and abetting in the possession with intent to distribute cocaine, defendant Paul Hernandez appeals from the district court’s denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion to return to him jewelry worn by him and seized at the time of his arrest. Finding that the district court was correct in concluding that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the motion, we affirm.

I

The Drug Enforcement Administration initiated administrative forfeiture proceedings against Hernandez’s property, as proceeds of unlawful…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evelyn Castleberry and Virginia R. Castleberry v. Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division of the Treasury Department of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Harold Wellington Rapp, Harold Wellington Rapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. D.K.G. Appaloosas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America Unknown Government OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. Martin Onwubiko v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. Samuel Fiacro Pena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. State v. TerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. Rosevita Charter Construction Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API