Becherl v. Plutchak
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Menominee; Elannigan, J. Attachment by Charles Becherl against Gustave Plutchak for the enforcement of a lien for labor against logs, etc. Samuel Crawford and others, copartners, doing business as S. Crawford & Sons, intervened. Judgment for plaintiff. Said interveners bring error. This is an action of attachment under Act No. 229 of the Public Acts of 1887 (3 Comp.
Read the full summary
Error to Menominee; Elannigan, J. Attachment by Charles Becherl against Gustave Plutchak for the enforcement of a lien for labor against logs, etc. Samuel Crawford and others, copartners, doing business as S. Crawford & Sons, intervened. Judgment for plaintiff. Said interveners bring error. This is an action of attachment under Act No. 229 of the Public Acts of 1887 (3 Comp. Laws, §§ 10756-10-799) to enforce a claim in the sum of $87.78 for labor performed by plaintiff on some lumber belonging to the defendants, doing business as S. Crawford & Sons, a copartnership. The labor was performed…
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
[after stating the facts). We will consider the questions raised in their order. (1) The statement of lien describes the property as “about 700,000 feet of maple, beech, elm, and basswood lumber * * * and the said described property, or a portion thereof, is now situated in the county of Menominee, State of Michigan.” The affidavit which 3 Comp. Laws, § 10763, requires to be annexed to the writ of attachment and the writ itself, described the property as follows:
“ About 700,000 feet of maple, beech, elm and basswood lumber (the same being lumber that was sawed by Gustave Plutchak for S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sexton v. McDowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Federspiel v. JohnstoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Dillon v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fleming v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949