Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Riley, Chrisopher

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 3, 2004No. 03-3118Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRogers, Circuit Judge

Because imposing a criminal sentence implicates “the most elemental of liberty interests — the interest in being free from physical detention by one’s own government,” Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2633, 2646, 159 L.Ed.2d 578 (2004) (citing Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 80, 112 S.Ct. 1780, 1785-86, 118 L.Ed.2d 437 (1979)), it is imperative that courts reach sentencing decisions properly. Cf. United States v. Saro, 24 F.3d 283, 287-88 (D.C.Cir.1994). The Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to End the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (“the PROTECT Act”), Pub. L.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API