Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Mooney

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1959No. Civ. No. 15087PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action object to defendants’ requests for admissions of facts submitted under Rule 36, Fed.R. Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. Defendants have requested that plaintiffs admit that certain diagnoses of wife plaintiff’s eye condition were in fact made. Plaintiffs object on the ground that admissions of these facts will deprive them of their right of cross-examination of the medical experts whose opinions form the subject matter of the requests for admissions.

Plaintiffs’ reluctance to answer is apparently based upon an assumption that the answers to defendants’…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Al-Jundi v. RockefellerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1981
  2. Bouchard v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API