Piep v. Baron
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan Lebowitz, J.
The issue to be resolved in this counterclaim is whether the *249filing of a lis pendens in support of an action for specific performance gives rise to a cause of action for abuse of process and malicious prosecution.
The instant proceeding arises out of a counterclaim for abuse of process and malicious prosecution interposed in the answer to the complaint for specific performance to enforce a sale of real property.
The facts are as follows:
Plaintiffs and defendant entered into a contract for the sale of premises 221-227 East 5th Street, Brooklyn, New York.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Molinoff v. SassowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Miller v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- North Triphammer Development Corp. v. Ithaca AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- City of Angoon v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior, and Shee Atika, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988