Legal Opinion

Piep v. Baron

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided September 25, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alan Lebowitz, J.

The issue to be resolved in this counterclaim is whether the *249filing of a lis pendens in support of an action for specific performance gives rise to a cause of action for abuse of process and malicious prosecution.

The instant proceeding arises out of a counterclaim for abuse of process and malicious prosecution interposed in the answer to the complaint for specific performance to enforce a sale of real property.

The facts are as follows:

Plaintiffs and defendant entered into a contract for the sale of premises 221-227 East 5th Street, Brooklyn, New York.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Molinoff v. SassowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Miller v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Triphammer Development Corp. v. Ithaca AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  2. City of Angoon v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior, and Shee Atika, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API