Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaresoN, J.

The question: Has the plaintiff, as assignee of Durham County, a secured depositor creditor of the Merchants -Bank of Durham, North Carolina, the right to receive dividends on $43,950.48, the total amount of its claim as it stood, at the time the bank was closed because of insolvency? We think not, under the facts and circumstances of this case.

N. C. Code, 1931 (Michie), sec. 1334(70), in part, is as follows: “The board of commissioners is hereby authorized and empowered to select and designate annually, by recorded resolution, some bank or banks or trust company in this State as an official…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Boney & Harper Milling Co. v. J. C. Stevenson Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Winston v. Biggs.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Merchants National Bank v. FlippenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Montsinger v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Rierson v. . HansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API