Legal Opinion
Marchwinski v. Howard
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 18, 2002No. 00-2115PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Douglas Howard, the director of the Michigan Family Independence Assistance program (“FIA”), appeals the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction based on Michigan’s failure to identify a “special need” related to public safety that would allow the state — without a requirement of individualized suspicion — to drug .test the plaintiff-appellees, a class of persons eligible for or receiving welfare assistance and subject to drug *332testing under Mich. Comp. Laws ANN. § 400.571. Because we find that safety need only be a factor in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The Taubman Company v. Webfeats, a Texas Company and Henry Mishkoff, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Big Time Worldwide Concert & Sport Club at Town Center, LLC v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Lebron v. WilkinsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- Smith v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
- INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNIT. AUTO., AERO. v. WintersDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.