Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael D. Stallman, J.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, union leaders seek declaratory and injunctive relief relating to the Work Experience Program (WEP) in the Parks Department. Petitioners claim that the City violated antidisplacement provisions of the State’s Welfare Reform Act of 1997, by using recipients of public assistance assigned to the City’s Work Experience Program to do the work of civil service employees.

Background

The City of New York implemented WEP programs mandated by federal and state “welfare reform” legislation in the 1990s that required public…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Featherstone v. FrancoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Rosenthal v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Ballentine v. SugarmanNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Wallace v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenthal v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API