Legal Opinion

Alexander's Department Stores, Inc. v. E. J. Korvette, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 2, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves under Rule 45(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. to quash defendants’ subpoena duces tecum and moves pursuant to Rule 30(b) for a protective order.

The complaint seeks an injunction, divestiture and treble damages in the amount of $10,500,000. It is predicated upon Section 7 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.A. § 18), which makes illegal the acquisition by one corporation of the stock of another

“where in any line of commerce in any section of the country, the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition, or to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Broadcast Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. Ostow & Jacobs, Inc. v. Morgan-Jones, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. Sensytrol Corp. v. Radio Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  3. MacDonald v. HyderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Federal Communications Commission, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Taft B. Schreiber and McA Inc., Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Federal Communications Commission, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Taft B. Schreiber and McA Inc., Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API