Legal Opinion

United States v. Immordino

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 3, 1974No. Civ. A. C-4511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CHILSON, District Judge.

The United States brought this action on behalf of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to recover on a promissory note in default pursuant to certain guaranty agreements securing the note. The note was executed on August 10, 1966, to secure a loan in the amount of $45,000.00 made by SBA to C & S Sales, Inc. d/b/a Building Products Inc. The note was secured by various items of collateral including four separate guaranty agreements executed respectively by Julius C. and Joanne Immordino, defendants and third party plaintiffs, Joseph C. and Dorothy M.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joe Heaston Tractor & Implement Company, a New Mexico Corporation v. Securities Acceptance Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. Newton Livestock Auction Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Vickers Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Ned Biffle, Sole Owner, Doing Business as Ned Biffle Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Julius C. Immordino and Joanne Immordino, and Third-Party v. Joseph C. Costa, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Frank J. Beardslee and Frances M. Beardslee, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  3. Continental Nat. Bank v. DolanColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Harris v. ObenshainDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1978
  5. Ensign Associates, LLC v. Grundy County Bank f/k/a The Grundy County National Bank, not personally, but as Trustee Under Trust Agreement Dated May 20, 1983District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API