Legal Opinion

Gray v. Bruce

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 12, 2001No. 01-3090PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Kevin and Marsha Gray, who are husband and wife and who appear pro se and in forma pauperis, appeal from the dismissal of their civil rights complaints brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court consolidated and then dismissed their suits under 28…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Williams v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Martinez v. AaronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. Perkins v. Kansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Hernández-De La RosaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
  2. Ahmad Bey v. Tyler Clark, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
  3. Williams (ID 103412) v. DaltonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API