Legal Opinion

State v. Hayward

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — Hon. O. D. Wheeler, Judge. The defendant was convicted of tbe crime of larceny, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, C. J.

1. ~ <?frevSue:Piñ-f structions. I. The indictment charged the larceny of a box of shoes of the value of $35. The undisputed evidence showed that there were at least twenty-four pairs of shoes in the box, and that they were of the value of $1.50 per pair. In a general instruction, |jie jul,y was ^0ld that to convict of the crime charged the state must prove .the value of the shoes, and in another instruction it was said, in effect, that such value must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. All of the evidence on the subject of value placed it at more than $30; and hence there was no occasion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrundigeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. State v. KimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. State v. RichartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. IveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. State v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. State v. FortuneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. State v. IrelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. State ex rel. McKeever v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API