Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena to John Doe

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided February 8, 2006No. 3:06-cv-00001Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER 1

CORRIGAN, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on the United States’ In Camera Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Witness Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court (Doc. S-5), and petitioner John Doe’s Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoena (Doe. S — 13). Petitioner responded in opposition to the United States’ Motion, (Doc. S-7), and the United States responded in opposition to petitioner’s Motion (Doc. S — 16). On February 2, 2006, the Court heard in camera argument on both motions.

I. BACKGROUND

On December 1, 2005, petitioner’s attorney accepted service of a grand jury subpoena…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API