Legal Opinion

Kepler v. NaphCare Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 21, 2025No. 4:24-cv-00220Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Karina Kepler, et al., No. CV-24-00220-TUC-AMM 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 NaphCare Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Karina Kepler and Carlin Casey’s Motion to 16 Compel Discovery from the County Defendants. (Doc. 68.) Plaintiffs seek to compel 17 Defendants Pima County and Sheriff Chris Nanos (together “County Defendants”) to 18 supplement or produce discovery. (Id.) The motion is fully briefed. (Docs. 70, 72.) For the 19 reasons addressed below, the Court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Jonathon Castro v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Mary Wilcox v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Christina Webb v. Trader Joe's CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API