Legal Opinion

United States v. David Lee Pace

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1987No. 84-5362PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

David Lee Pace appeals his conviction for robbery of the Rockwell Federal Credit Union in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). On appeal, Pace contends: (1) the admission of the testimony of a cellmate informant to whom Pace made incriminating statements violated Pace’s sixth amendment right to counsel, (2) Pace’s fifth amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination was violated when he was not given Miranda warnings prior to making the incriminating statements, (3) cross-examination of two adverse witnesses was imper-missibly restricted, (4) the trial…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. Darweshi DinkaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Ronald Olen BurrowsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Kenneth Herbert Linn, A/K/A Dennis Kenneth LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Patrick PedroniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Scott Robin RostonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API