Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1979No. 7810INS625PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

We note with disapproval that counsel for the Bureau has failed to comply with the requirements of App. R. 10(b)(1): “Each exception shall be set out immediately following the record of judicial action to which it is addressed.” App. R. 10(a) makes clear that exceptions not so set out in the record cannot be made the bases of assignments of error. The necessity for this rule is most obvious in cases such as the one before us, which involves a 442-page record. It is an unnecessary waste of judicial time, and a source of possibly ineffective review, to require this Court to guess…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Automobile Rate Administrative OfficeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. Rate BureauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating BureauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Redmond Ex Rel. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API