Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Heidenrich

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This is a motion by the defendant Heidenrich to change the place of trial in the above action from the county of Albany to the city and county of New York, upon the ground that said action affects real estate situate in the city of New York, and is therefore local.

1Opinion of the CourtIngalls, J.

This action is instituted by the plaintiff, as receiver, to reach the property of the defendant Samuel L; Eisner, and to cause the same to be applied in satisfaction of the judgments mentioned in the complaint.

The plaintiff alleges, among other things, in his complaint, • in substance, that the said Samuel L. Eisner had acquired an interest in the estate of his father Henry Eisner, deceased, consisting of real and personal estate situated in the city of New York, under the provisions of the will of his said father; that Samuel L. Eisner, by an instrument in writing, transferred to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Leland v. HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Park v. CarnleyNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McConihe v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Sherman v. Adirondack Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Sherman v. Adirondack Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API