Rogers v. Reynolds
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and new trial granted on the issue of damages only. Memorandum: We have reviewed the court’s charge on the issue of liability and we find it to be essentially correct. Although it was not proper to charge that the restaurant owner defendants had "special skills”, the court otherwise repeatedly made it clear that it was their duty to "use the skill and care that others in the [restaurant business] would reasonably use in the same situation”. Viewed in its entirety, the charge correctly stated the rule to be applied by the jury to this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDougald v. GarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Nussbaum v. GibsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Small v. . HousmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- Viscomi v. S.S. Kresge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990