Legal Opinion

Colwell v. Easley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1877PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Armstrong county: Of October and November Term 1876, No. 140.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon

The case for consideration has its origin in this wise: James Easley issued a writ of scire facias on a judgment which he had obtained against Hugh Campbell and R. S. Connor, and caused John A. ColAYell to be named as terre-tenant. Colwell caused *32appearance to be entered in his own behalf, and put in certain pleas, among others, that “ The judgment sought to be revived by scire facias is no lien on the lands of J. A. Colwell, and never was.” The case came on for trial March 14th 1876, when, before jury called, Hugh Campbell confessed judgment, and the trial proceeded as to the terre-tenant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jarrett v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Handel & Hayden Building & Loan Ass'n v. EllefordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Cancilla v. BondySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Cusano v. RubolinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Kefover v. HusteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. So. Cent. B. L. Assn. v. MilaniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API