Epshteyn v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s counsel, relying on the erroneous advice of a federal official, filed this *256untimely suit against the United States of America (the “government”). Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff argues in opposition that the government should be estopped from invoking the correct statute of limitations to bar this suit. Since plaintiffs opposition is based on undisputed facts that do not appear on the face of the complaint, I treat the government’s motion as one for summary judgment. The motion is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- James E. McCormick and Carol Ann McCormick Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- T. J. Falgout Boats, Inc. And Insurance Company of North America v. United States of America, the Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- John C. Szyka v. United States Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Epshteyn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993